# 1260 1290 1335 and 888

Something new here. This is just plain amazing to me! These are the numbers of ‘days’ found in the Revelation (1260) and Daniel (1290 and 1335).

So, we digit group the three numbers. Sum the results 🙂

1260 -> 1 + 260 -> 261
1290 -> 1 + 290 -> 291
1335 -> 1 + 335 -> 336

261 + 291 + 336 = 888 (which is the gematria of “Jesus”, of course)

And it just gets better :). Here we just add the numbers together and digit group the result:-

1260 + 1290 + 1335 = 3885
3885 -> 3 + 885 = 888

(Oh, by the way, 7 * 555 = 3885!)

Now, look at this.
We are going to rearrange the digits starting with the second digit and the final result will then be grouped starting from the left. You’ll see 🙂

1260 -> 2601
1290 -> 2901
1335 -> 3351
2601 + 2901 + 3351 = 8853

Group  8853 starting from the left -> 885  + 3 = 888.

(Grouping from the left -I think i’ll call this ‘reverse digit grouping’ for now).

Let’s try starting with the third digit:-
1260 -> 6012
1290 -> 9012
1335 -> 3513
6012 + 9012 + 3513 = 18537
Group 18537 from the right (normal):-
537 + 18 = 555
Group 18537 from the left (reverse grouping):-
185 + 37 = 222
Ok, it’s not 888 but neither is it that ‘random’ either!

555 + 222 = 777.  Try searching this blog for 777 🙂

Ok, now starting with the fouth digit:-

1260 -> 0126
1290 -> 0129
1335 -> 5133

0126 + 0129 + 5133 = 5388

We have seen above where we just add the numbers together and digit group the result, 3885, how that 885 +3 = 888

Starting as have with the fourth digit, we can see echoes of this in 5388.

(885 is formed by starting grouping at the third digit and returning to the left hand start to pick up the 5 to form a three digit number).

Let’s try a matrix.

1   2   6   0

1   2   9   0

1   3   3   5

Letr’s add the numbers in the vertical columns:-

1 + 1 + 1 = 3

2 + 2 + 3 =7

6 + 9 + 3  = 18

0 + 0 + 5 = 5

The result can be represented as  37185. This is similar to the results for the third digit grouping star (where the number was 18537)

37 + 185 = 222

It all seems tied together to me.

………………………………………………….

888 is the gematria of “JESUS”

There is more as my blog shows:-
https://word37.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/1260-1290-1335/

1260 1290 1335

1260 + 1290 + 1335 = 3885

and 3 + 885 = 888

Factors for 3885:- 1(star 1), 3, 5, 7, 15, 21, 35, 37(star 3), 105, 111, 185, 259, 555, 777, 1295, 3885
Digit group for 3885 = 3 + 885 = 888.
Digit group result factors:- 1(star 1), 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 37(star 3), 74, 111, 148, 222, 296, 444, 888

37 , 888, oh my!!!
555 and 222 factors echoing the third digit start scenario as detailed above.

…………………..

Update here 5 April 2014:-

I have noticed that seemingly any number that possesses 4 digits has this double property in it’s digit grouping. Here is an example:-

7777

7777 + 7777 + 7777 = 23331  = 23 + 331 = 354

Digit group first:-

7777 = 7 + 777 = 784
784 + 784 + 784 = 2352 = 2 + 352 = 354

Let’s try again:-

1111, 2222  and 3333

1111 + 2222 + 3333 = 6666 = 6 + 666 = 672

Digit group first:-

1111 = 1 + 111 = 112
2222 = 2 + 222 = 224
3333 = 3 + 333 = 336

112 + 224 + 336 = 672

Whether this is a well known mathematical fact, I don’t know.
To my mind, really does lend more credence to the simple idea of digit grouping numbers.

The fact that 1260, 1290 and 1335 result in 888 via both methods (ie; digit group the sum Or digit group then sum) is therefore inevitable once one of the digit grouping methods is processed.

This does not detract from these divinely given numbers. Indeed, the post on 2300 shows that 1335 has significance when connected to 2300.

…………………..

Let’s stay calm.

2Pe 3:8  But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

Here we have  the 1 is as a 1000 and 1000 is as a 1 statement. Peter states it in reference to the day of judgement.
I have employed this digit grouping throughout this blog and it definitely appears to be a real phenomena within the scriptures and the method is very similar to what peter is stating.
In the above two examples, the 1000 of 1260, for example, becomes a 1  and thus 1260 becomes 1 + 260 = 261

What this is unequivocally telling us is that these mysterious numbers, 1260, 1290 and 1335, refer unambiguously to JESUS, the gematria of JESUS being 888.

G2424
Ἰησοῦς
Iēsous
ee-ay-sooce’
Of Hebrew origin [H3091]; Jesus (that is, Jehoshua), the name of our Lord and two (three) other Israelites: – Jesus.

Ἰ(10) η(8) σ(200) ο(70) ῦ(400) ς (200)

(Total = 888. Factors:- 1(star 1), 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 37(star 3), 74, 111, 148, 222, 296, 444, 888)

[Note:- the first six occurrences of JESUS in Matthew are, in the text, spelt   “ιησου” ie; without the sigma, “ς” (200)Come the seventh spelling and it is Ἰησοῦς”. In the New Testament, “ιησου” (688) occurs 339 times, “ιησουν” (738) occurs 131 times and Ἰησοῦς” (888) occurs 503 times.There appears to be a few other occurrences as well but this may be down to different greek versions, etc, or possibly other spellings, not going down that road today. The full spelling of our Lord’s name is given in Strongs, BDB and KJ Concordance as “Ἰησοῦς”, (888).]

So what I propose is this, for the moment, rather than trying to fit these days to Daniel’s 70th week ( and I am not saying that is not a worthwhile endeavour ) which has been done time and again, I am just leaving these numbers in their connection to the name of JESUS.

What do these numbers mean? I am pondering these things in the next post:-
http://alphaomega37.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/126012901335-and-888-continued.html

## 2 thoughts on “1260 1290 1335 and 888”

1. Matt37 says:

Can you link me to any other sites that deal with 37? thanks!!!
And feel free to email me if you wish.

2. rs37 says:

http://www.whatabeginning.com
This is the best place to start. Prepare to be stunned!

http://www.fivedoves.com/numberbite/NUMBERBITE_0010.htm
Ian mallett has a number of excellent pages published on the fivedoves website. Ian malletts work (aka rev natch) is very good.

On google books there is title called “373 a Proof Set in Stone”. Not sure how genuinely original it is, a lot of material is very derivative now and if you do peruse it I should point out on the author’s website he subscribes to partial preterism.